Hypnosis for Acute Procedural Pain: A Critical Review

Cassie Kendrick, Jim Sliwinski, Yimin Yu, Aimee Johnson, William Fisher, Zoltán Kekecs, Gary Elkins

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragÖversiktsartikelPeer review

Sammanfattning

Clinical evidence for the effectiveness of hypnosis in the treatment of acute procedural pain was critically evaluated based on reports from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Results from the 29 RCTs meeting inclusion criteria suggest that hypnosis decreases pain compared to standard care and attention control groups and that it is at least as effective as comparable adjunct psychological or behavioral therapies. In addition, applying hypnosis in multiple sessions prior to the day of the procedure produced the highest percentage of significant results. Hypnosis was most effective in minor surgical procedures. However, interpretations are limited by considerable risk of bias. Further studies using minimally effective control conditions and systematic control of intervention dose and timing are required to strengthen conclusions.

Originalspråkengelska
Sidor (från-till)75-115
Antal sidor41
TidskriftInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Volym64
Nummer1
DOI
StatusPublished - 2016 jan. 2
Externt publiceradJa

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

  • Psykologi

Fingeravtryck

Utforska forskningsämnen för ”Hypnosis for Acute Procedural Pain: A Critical Review”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här