International scope of biomedical research ethics review: Many countries consider long-term implications for society

Mark A.  Rothstein; Kelly Carty Zimmerer Zimmerer; Pamela  Andanda; Thalia  Arawi; Fabiana  Arzuaga; Haidan  Chen; Martine  de Vries; Edward  Dove; Mohammed  Ghaly; Ryoko  Hatanaka; Aart C Hendriks; Mireya  Castañeda Hernández; Calvin W. L.  Ho; Yann  Joly; Dorota  Krekora-Zając; Won  Bok Lee; Titti Mattsson; Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor; Kakai  Namalwa; Pilar Nicolás; Jane Nielsen; Obiajulu  Nnamuchi; Margaret Otlowski; Nicole Palmour; Emmanuelle  Rial-Sebbag; Gil Siegal; Jane M. Wathuta; Ma’n H.  Zawati; Bartha Martha Knoppers

International scope of biomedical research ethics review: Many countries consider long-term implications for society

Mark A. Rothstein, Kelly Carty Zimmerer Zimmerer, Pamela Andanda, Thalia Arawi, Fabiana Arzuaga, Haidan Chen, Martine de Vries, Edward Dove, Mohammed Ghaly, Ryoko Hatanaka, Aart C Hendriks, Mireya Castañeda Hernández, Calvin W. L. Ho, Yann Joly, Dorota Krekora-Zając, Won Bok Lee, Titti Mattsson, Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor, Kakai Namalwa, Pilar NicolásJane Nielsen, Obiajulu Nnamuchi, Margaret Otlowski, Nicole Palmour, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Gil Siegal, Jane M. Wathuta, Ma’n H. Zawati, Bartha Martha Knoppers

Forskningsoutput: Tidskriftsbidrag › Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift › Peer review

Sammanfattning

In the context of biomedical research
involving human subjects, the review
of research proposals by ethics committees
in virtually every country has
traditionally focused on informed consent
and other protections for individuals
participating in research (1). However,
the substantial societal implications of
modern biomedical research and the globalization
of scientific inquiry make it important
to understand whether research
ethics review in each country addresses
both individual and societal issues. Knowledge
of the practices internationally can
promote understanding and can suggest
possible innovations for specific countries.
Below, we explore three related issues: (i)
whether biomedical research ethics review
considers the societal and long-term implications
of the research, (ii) whether bodies
charged with performing research ethics
reviews are appropriate to consider these
issues, and (iii) the feasibility and likely
support for embedding multidisciplinary
researchers with scientists to study societal
and long-term implications. We address
current regulatory policies and offer
comments about possible changes.

Originalspråk	engelska
Sidor (från-till)	145-147
Antal sidor	3
Tidskrift	Science
Volym	385
Nummer	6705
Status	Published - 2024 juli 14

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

Juridik

Fria nyckelord

Biomedical research ethics
Societal implications
Ethical review board
Law and ethics
Administrative law

FN:s Globala mål

Denna forskningsoutput relaterar till följande Globala mål

Tillgång till dokument

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adp6277

Andra filer och länkar

Supplementary Materials for International scope of biomedical research ethics review

1 Avslutade
2 Aktiva

Vulnerability in the Automated State
Fernandes Da Silva Ranchordás, S. H. (PI), Käll, J. (PI), Larsson, S. (Forskare), York, T. (Forskarstuderande), Nerland, E. H. (Forskarstuderande) & Mattsson, T. (Forskare)
2023/09/01 → 2028/08/31
Projekt: Forskning
AIR Lund: AIR Lund - Användning av artificiell intelligens inom registerforskning
Björk, J. (Forskare), Ohlsson, M. (Forskare), Melander, O. (Forskare), Ekelund, U. (Forskare), Larsson, S. (Forskare), Mattsson, T. (Forskare), Mokhtari, A. (Forskare), de Vries, K. (Forskare), Nilsson, A. (Forskare), Lingman, M. (Forskare), Pashami, S. (Forskare), Ottosson, F. (Forskare), Larsson, A. E. (Administratör), Henriksen, A. (Forskare), Högberg, C. (Forskarstuderande), Olsson, M. (Forskarstuderande), Nyström, A. (Forskarstuderande), Olsson de Capretz, P. (Forskarstuderande), Björkelund, A. (Forskare), Nilsson, A. (Forskare), Åkesson, A. (Forskarstuderande), Nordberg, A. (Forskare), Ekström, M. (Forskare), Tolestam Heyman, E. (Forskarstuderande), Lundager Forberg, J. (Forskare), Berg, J. (Forskarstuderande), Johansson, A. (Forskarstuderande), Amirahmadi, A. (Forskarstuderande), Eriksson, T. (Forskarstuderande), Khoshnood, A. (Forskare), Mäkinen, M. (Forskarstuderande), Müllerová, P. (Forskare) & Nilsson, T. N. (Forskarstuderande)
2018/07/01 → 2024/12/31
Projekt: Forskning
Law and vulnerabilities
Andersson, U. (PI) & Mattsson, T. (PI)
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (RJ)
2012/01/01 → 2014/12/31
Projekt: Nätverk

Citera det här

Rothstein, M. A., Zimmerer, K. C. Z., Andanda, P., Arawi, T., Arzuaga, F., Chen, H., de Vries, M., Dove, E., Ghaly, M., Hatanaka, R., Hendriks, A. C., Castañeda Hernández, M., Ho, C. W. L., Joly, Y., Krekora-Zając, D., Bok Lee, W., Mattsson, T., Molnár-Gábor, F., Namalwa, K., ... Knoppers, B. M. (2024). International scope of biomedical research ethics review: Many countries consider long-term implications for society. Science, 385(6705), 145-147. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adp6277

@article{5a820faf727346abae379139048ac739,

title = "International scope of biomedical research ethics review: Many countries consider long-term implications for society",

abstract = "In the context of biomedical researchinvolving human subjects, the reviewof research proposals by ethics committeesin virtually every country hastraditionally focused on informed consentand other protections for individualsparticipating in research (1). However,the substantial societal implications ofmodern biomedical research and the globalizationof scientific inquiry make it importantto understand whether researchethics review in each country addressesboth individual and societal issues. Knowledgeof the practices internationally canpromote understanding and can suggestpossible innovations for specific countries.Below, we explore three related issues: (i)whether biomedical research ethics reviewconsiders the societal and long-term implicationsof the research, (ii) whether bodiescharged with performing research ethicsreviews are appropriate to consider theseissues, and (iii) the feasibility and likelysupport for embedding multidisciplinaryresearchers with scientists to study societaland long-term implications. We addresscurrent regulatory policies and offercomments about possible changes.",

keywords = "Biomedical research ethics, Societal implications, Ethical review board, Law and ethics, Administrative law, Biomedical research ethics, Societal implications, Ethical review board, Law and ethics, F{\"o}rvaltningsr{\"a}tt",

author = "Rothstein, {Mark A.} and Zimmerer, {Kelly Carty Zimmerer} and Pamela Andanda and Thalia Arawi and Fabiana Arzuaga and Haidan Chen and {de Vries}, Martine and Edward Dove and Mohammed Ghaly and Ryoko Hatanaka and Hendriks, {Aart C} and {Casta{\~n}eda Hern{\'a}ndez}, Mireya and Ho, {Calvin W. L.} and Yann Joly and Dorota Krekora-Zaj{\c a}c and {Bok Lee}, Won and Titti Mattsson and Fruzsina Moln{\'a}r-G{\'a}bor and Kakai Namalwa and Pilar Nicol{\'a}s and Jane Nielsen and Obiajulu Nnamuchi and Margaret Otlowski and Nicole Palmour and Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag and Gil Siegal and Wathuta, {Jane M.} and Zawati, {Ma{\textquoteright}n H.} and Knoppers, {Bartha Martha}",

year = "2024",

month = jul,

day = "14",

language = "English",

volume = "385",

pages = "145--147",

journal = "Science",

issn = "1095-9203",

publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)",

number = "6705",

}

Rothstein, MA, Zimmerer, KCZ, Andanda, P, Arawi, T, Arzuaga, F, Chen, H, de Vries, M, Dove, E, Ghaly, M, Hatanaka, R, Hendriks, AC, Castañeda Hernández, M, Ho, CWL, Joly, Y, Krekora-Zając, D, Bok Lee, W, Mattsson, T, Molnár-Gábor, F, Namalwa, K, Nicolás, P, Nielsen, J, Nnamuchi, O, Otlowski, M, Palmour, N, Rial-Sebbag, E, Siegal, G, Wathuta, JM, Zawati, MH & Knoppers, BM 2024, 'International scope of biomedical research ethics review: Many countries consider long-term implications for society', Science, vol. 385, nr. 6705, s. 145-147. <https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adp6277>

TY - JOUR

T1 - International scope of biomedical research ethics review

T2 - Many countries consider long-term implications for society

AU - Rothstein, Mark A.

AU - Zimmerer, Kelly Carty Zimmerer

AU - Andanda, Pamela

AU - Arawi, Thalia

AU - Arzuaga, Fabiana

AU - Chen, Haidan

AU - de Vries, Martine

AU - Dove, Edward

AU - Ghaly, Mohammed

AU - Hatanaka, Ryoko

AU - Hendriks, Aart C

AU - Castañeda Hernández, Mireya

AU - Ho, Calvin W. L.

AU - Joly, Yann

AU - Krekora-Zając, Dorota

AU - Bok Lee, Won

AU - Mattsson, Titti

AU - Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina

AU - Namalwa, Kakai

AU - Nicolás, Pilar

AU - Nielsen, Jane

AU - Nnamuchi, Obiajulu

AU - Otlowski, Margaret

AU - Palmour, Nicole

AU - Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle

AU - Siegal, Gil

AU - Wathuta, Jane M.

AU - Zawati, Ma’n H.

AU - Knoppers, Bartha Martha

PY - 2024/7/14

Y1 - 2024/7/14

N2 - In the context of biomedical researchinvolving human subjects, the reviewof research proposals by ethics committeesin virtually every country hastraditionally focused on informed consentand other protections for individualsparticipating in research (1). However,the substantial societal implications ofmodern biomedical research and the globalizationof scientific inquiry make it importantto understand whether researchethics review in each country addressesboth individual and societal issues. Knowledgeof the practices internationally canpromote understanding and can suggestpossible innovations for specific countries.Below, we explore three related issues: (i)whether biomedical research ethics reviewconsiders the societal and long-term implicationsof the research, (ii) whether bodiescharged with performing research ethicsreviews are appropriate to consider theseissues, and (iii) the feasibility and likelysupport for embedding multidisciplinaryresearchers with scientists to study societaland long-term implications. We addresscurrent regulatory policies and offercomments about possible changes.

AB - In the context of biomedical researchinvolving human subjects, the reviewof research proposals by ethics committeesin virtually every country hastraditionally focused on informed consentand other protections for individualsparticipating in research (1). However,the substantial societal implications ofmodern biomedical research and the globalizationof scientific inquiry make it importantto understand whether researchethics review in each country addressesboth individual and societal issues. Knowledgeof the practices internationally canpromote understanding and can suggestpossible innovations for specific countries.Below, we explore three related issues: (i)whether biomedical research ethics reviewconsiders the societal and long-term implicationsof the research, (ii) whether bodiescharged with performing research ethicsreviews are appropriate to consider theseissues, and (iii) the feasibility and likelysupport for embedding multidisciplinaryresearchers with scientists to study societaland long-term implications. We addresscurrent regulatory policies and offercomments about possible changes.

KW - Biomedical research ethics

KW - Societal implications

KW - Ethical review board

KW - Law and ethics

KW - Administrative law

KW - Biomedical research ethics

KW - Societal implications

KW - Ethical review board

KW - Law and ethics

KW - Förvaltningsrätt

M3 - Article

SN - 1095-9203

VL - 385

SP - 145

EP - 147

JO - Science

JF - Science

IS - 6705

ER -

International scope of biomedical research ethics review: Many countries consider long-term implications for society

Sammanfattning

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

Fria nyckelord

FN:s Globala mål

Tillgång till dokument

Andra filer och länkar

Projekt

Vulnerability in the Automated State

AIR Lund: AIR Lund - Användning av artificiell intelligens inom registerforskning

Law and vulnerabilities

Citera det här