I will propose some ideas about such pictures claiming to be self-demonstrating or selfillustrating, mostly using some classical anatomy illustrations. Based on these you may say that the anatomy seems to create a remarkable, realistic pictorial code, which casts together in one single, selfdemonstrating shape, an object of knowledge with the properties of the natural object itself. This is the paradox of the self-demonstrating picture’s double illusion of communication: on the one hand it seems to be a picture of the natural appearance of the object, but on the other it is, in fact, simultaneously a depiction of a cognitive concept, a visual name of this object. It is a conditional and man-made classification, which is embodied into the body itself.
|Nummer||No. 1-2, 2010/11|
|Konferens||The Image in Science: Infrequently Asked Questions. Responses of the humanities to visualism in science.|
|Period||2009/11/06 → …|
The paper is accepted to be published in the journal Ideas in History.