Précis: A correct diagnosis of glaucoma established at initial visits. Purpose: It has been suggested that a diagnosis of glaucoma cannot be certain until progression has been demonstrated. Our aim was to evaluate the correctness of a glaucoma diagnosis established after 2 initial visits. Patients and Methods: Patients included in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial (EMGT) who had continued follow-up for at least 15 years were included in this analysis. The patients had been recruited primarily through a population screening and were diagnosed with glaucoma if the Glaucoma Hemifield Test was outside normal limits in the same sector at two consecutive visits. A Glaucoma Hemifield Test classification of borderline was also diagnostic if corresponding optic disc findings were present. At least one of the following criteria had to be fulfilled during follow-up to confirm the initial diagnosis: (1) visual field progression in at least one eye according to the EMGT criterion; (2) development of manifest glaucoma in an initially ineligible fellow eye; (3) optic disc progression in at least one eye; (4) optic disc hemorrhages in at least 1 eye. Results: Of the 255 patients included in the EMGT, 117 were followed for at least 15 years, representing 147 eyes eligible for our study. During follow-up, 134 eyes (91%) showed visual field progression, and, of the remaining 13 eyes, only 4 (3%) did not fulfill any of the criteria to confirm the diagnosis. Conclusions: A diagnosis made applying strict criteria to 2 initial visual field tests, supported by optic disc findings if visual field findings were borderline, was almost always correct.
|Tidskrift||Journal of Glaucoma|
|Status||Published - 2019|