TY - JOUR
T1 - Minimizing tearing during vaginal delivery with a perineal protection device
T2 - a randomized controlled trial
AU - André, Kristin
AU - Leijonhufvud, Åsa
AU - Ignell, Claes
AU - Källén, Karin
AU - Stuart, Andrea
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - BackgroundThere is a growing body of evidence indicating that second degree tears cause both short-, and long-term consequences. Very few preventative measures have been found to reduce the incidence of these tears.ObjectiveTo investigate if the use of a perineal protection device during vaginal birth reduces severe perineal tearing (≥grade 2 tear) in primiparous women compared to routine manual perineal support.Study designA single center randomized controlled trial was performed in Sweden 2019-2021. Primiparous women at term were randomly allocated to the intervention group (n=43) where a perineal protection device was used, or to receive routine care (n=49). Main outcome measurement was grade of perineal tear. Secondary outcomes were vaginal and labial tearing. Continuous data was analyzed with Student's T-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Dichotomous data were analyzed with Pearson X2 test, Fisher's Exact test, and ordinal logistic regression.ResultsWomen in the intervention group had a significantly lower risk of sustaining more extensive perineal tearing as compared to the control group. Use of the perineal protection device decreased risk of ≥grade 2 tears, in relation to grade 0-1 tears (OR 0.40 [95% CI 0.17–0.94]). Ordinal logistic regression analyses revealed an OR of 0.36 (0.16–0.81) for one-grade-injury increment, using the perineal protection device vs control group (p=0.013). Number needed to treat using the perineal protection device was 4.3 to avoid one ≥grade 2 tear. Women in the treatment group had less labial tearing (p=0.016). No adverse effects were detected.ConclusionsUse of the perineal protection device reduced the risk of perineal tearing ≥grade 2 tear by 60% as well as labial tearing.
AB - BackgroundThere is a growing body of evidence indicating that second degree tears cause both short-, and long-term consequences. Very few preventative measures have been found to reduce the incidence of these tears.ObjectiveTo investigate if the use of a perineal protection device during vaginal birth reduces severe perineal tearing (≥grade 2 tear) in primiparous women compared to routine manual perineal support.Study designA single center randomized controlled trial was performed in Sweden 2019-2021. Primiparous women at term were randomly allocated to the intervention group (n=43) where a perineal protection device was used, or to receive routine care (n=49). Main outcome measurement was grade of perineal tear. Secondary outcomes were vaginal and labial tearing. Continuous data was analyzed with Student's T-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Dichotomous data were analyzed with Pearson X2 test, Fisher's Exact test, and ordinal logistic regression.ResultsWomen in the intervention group had a significantly lower risk of sustaining more extensive perineal tearing as compared to the control group. Use of the perineal protection device decreased risk of ≥grade 2 tears, in relation to grade 0-1 tears (OR 0.40 [95% CI 0.17–0.94]). Ordinal logistic regression analyses revealed an OR of 0.36 (0.16–0.81) for one-grade-injury increment, using the perineal protection device vs control group (p=0.013). Number needed to treat using the perineal protection device was 4.3 to avoid one ≥grade 2 tear. Women in the treatment group had less labial tearing (p=0.016). No adverse effects were detected.ConclusionsUse of the perineal protection device reduced the risk of perineal tearing ≥grade 2 tear by 60% as well as labial tearing.
KW - birth injury
KW - perineal protection device
KW - perineal tear
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101402
DO - 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101402
M3 - Article
C2 - 38880240
SN - 2589-9333
VL - 6
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM
JF - American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM
IS - 9
M1 - 101402
ER -