TY - JOUR
T1 - Not all emotional demands are the same
T2 - Emotional demands from clients’ or co-workers’ relations have different associations with well-being in service workers
AU - Duarte, Joana
AU - Berthelsen, Hanne
AU - Owen, Mikaela
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This research was funded by AFA Försäkring (AFA Insurance), Grant no. 170262, by Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (The Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare), FORTE Grant no. 2016-07220 and Malmö University.
Funding Information:
This research was funded by AFA F?rs?kring (AFA Insurance), Grant no. 170262, by Forskningsr?det om H?lsa, Arbetsliv och V?lf?rd (The Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare), FORTE Grant no. 2016-07220 and Malm? University. The authors wish to thank Josefin Bj?rk for her outstanding work with the data collection.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - There has been an increased interest in the study of emotional demands (ED) at work and its impact on workers’ well-being. However, ED have been conceptualized as a unitary concept, focused on interactions with clients, and excluding other potential sources of ED at work. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to explore the relation between ED from different relational sources (clients/patients/customers and colleagues, supervisors, and employees) and service workers’ exhaustion and engagement. Cross-sectional data from a sample of 2742 service workers were analysed using structural equation modelling. Results showed that ED from both sources (clients and colleagues) were associated with more emotional exhaustion, particularly if dealing with clients was not an integrated part of the role. Further, ED from clients’ relations were negatively associated with engagement for managers with staff responsibility, but positively for managers without staff responsibility. We also found moderating effects of psychosocial safety climate (PSC), whereby ED had the strongest effect on emotional exhaustion when PSC was low. This study suggests that different relational sources of ED at work have a different impact on employees’ well-being. Strategies that promote a reduction of extra-role ED, and the development of a PSC in the organization, could therefore offer possible solutions to promote employees’ psychological well-being and motivation.
AB - There has been an increased interest in the study of emotional demands (ED) at work and its impact on workers’ well-being. However, ED have been conceptualized as a unitary concept, focused on interactions with clients, and excluding other potential sources of ED at work. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to explore the relation between ED from different relational sources (clients/patients/customers and colleagues, supervisors, and employees) and service workers’ exhaustion and engagement. Cross-sectional data from a sample of 2742 service workers were analysed using structural equation modelling. Results showed that ED from both sources (clients and colleagues) were associated with more emotional exhaustion, particularly if dealing with clients was not an integrated part of the role. Further, ED from clients’ relations were negatively associated with engagement for managers with staff responsibility, but positively for managers without staff responsibility. We also found moderating effects of psychosocial safety climate (PSC), whereby ED had the strongest effect on emotional exhaustion when PSC was low. This study suggests that different relational sources of ED at work have a different impact on employees’ well-being. Strategies that promote a reduction of extra-role ED, and the development of a PSC in the organization, could therefore offer possible solutions to promote employees’ psychological well-being and motivation.
KW - Emotional demands
KW - Emotional exhaustion
KW - Engagement
KW - Psychosocial safety climate
KW - Service work
KW - Structural equation modelling
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph17217738
DO - 10.3390/ijerph17217738
M3 - Article
C2 - 33105900
AN - SCOPUS:85094147231
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 17
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 21
M1 - 7738
ER -