TY - JOUR
T1 - On the importance of the support material for enzymatic synthesis in organic media
T2 - Support effects at controlled water activity
AU - ADLERCREUTZ, Patrick
PY - 1991/1/1
Y1 - 1991/1/1
N2 - Enzymes were deposited on different porous support materials and these preparations were used to catalyze reactions in organic media. Reactions were carried out at specific water activities, achieved by equilibrating both the enzyme preparation and the substrate solution at the desired water activity before mixing them and thereby starting the reactions. The reaction rates obtained at the same water activity with different supports differed greatly, indicating a direct influence of the support on the enzyme. For horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase, Celite was the best support, and the reaction rate increased with increasing water activity. In the α‐chymotrypsin‐catalyzed alcoholysis of N‐acetyl‐l‐phenylalanine ethyl ester with 1‐butanol, high rates were again obtained with Celite, but with this support only about one third of the ethyl ester was converted to butyl ester, the rest was hydrolyzed. With the polyamide support, Accurel PA6, alcoholysis was the dominating reaction, and by using a low water activity (0.33), hydrolysis was completely suppressed while still maintaining a high alcoholysis activity. Controlled pore glass (CPG), derivatized with either hexyl or glucosyl groups, had quite different properties as enzyme supports. For horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase, glucose‐CPG was a much better support than hexyl‐CPG, and in the α‐chymotrypsin‐catalyzed reactions, glucose‐CPG favored hydrolysis, and hexyl‐CPG alcoholysis, at water activities exceeding 0.8. The results are discussed considering the absorption of water on the enzymes, on the supports and the solubility of water in the reaction media; all these parameters were measured separately.
AB - Enzymes were deposited on different porous support materials and these preparations were used to catalyze reactions in organic media. Reactions were carried out at specific water activities, achieved by equilibrating both the enzyme preparation and the substrate solution at the desired water activity before mixing them and thereby starting the reactions. The reaction rates obtained at the same water activity with different supports differed greatly, indicating a direct influence of the support on the enzyme. For horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase, Celite was the best support, and the reaction rate increased with increasing water activity. In the α‐chymotrypsin‐catalyzed alcoholysis of N‐acetyl‐l‐phenylalanine ethyl ester with 1‐butanol, high rates were again obtained with Celite, but with this support only about one third of the ethyl ester was converted to butyl ester, the rest was hydrolyzed. With the polyamide support, Accurel PA6, alcoholysis was the dominating reaction, and by using a low water activity (0.33), hydrolysis was completely suppressed while still maintaining a high alcoholysis activity. Controlled pore glass (CPG), derivatized with either hexyl or glucosyl groups, had quite different properties as enzyme supports. For horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase, glucose‐CPG was a much better support than hexyl‐CPG, and in the α‐chymotrypsin‐catalyzed reactions, glucose‐CPG favored hydrolysis, and hexyl‐CPG alcoholysis, at water activities exceeding 0.8. The results are discussed considering the absorption of water on the enzymes, on the supports and the solubility of water in the reaction media; all these parameters were measured separately.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025870959&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16161.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16161.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 1868847
AN - SCOPUS:0025870959
SN - 0014-2956
VL - 199
SP - 609
EP - 614
JO - European Journal of Biochemistry
JF - European Journal of Biochemistry
IS - 3
ER -