TY - JOUR
T1 - Repeatability of Epithelium Thickness Measured by an AS-OCT in Different Grades of Keratoconus and Compared to AS-OCT/Placido Topography
AU - Wang, Yiran
AU - Ning, Rui
AU - Li, Kexin
AU - Xu, Huilin
AU - Li, Yue
AU - Yang, Yizhou
AU - Gustafsson, Ingemar
AU - Zhou, Xingtao
AU - Qu, Xiaomei
AU - Huang, Jinhai
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - PURPOSE: To compare agreement of corneal epithelium thickness (ET) between AS-OCT system (RTVue, Optovue) and AS-OCT/Placido topographer (MS-39, CSO) in eyes with different stages of keratoconus (KC), and to assess the repeatability of RTVue AS-OCT. DESIGN: Prospective reliability analysis. METHODS: KC eyes were classified into forme fruste KC (FFKC), mild, moderate, and severe KC. Agreement was evaluated with Bland–Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). The repeatability of RTVue was assessed via within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test–retest variability (TRT), coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: A total of 119 KC eyes were enrolled, with 21 being FFKC, 26 mild, 39 moderate, and 34 severe. The 95% LoA ranged between −5.9 and 4.8 µm for center epithelium thickness (CET), between −5.7 and 8.2 µm for thinnest epithelium thickness (TET). At 1-mm measuring points, the 95% LoA of superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal were −4.2 to 4.7 µm, −5.2 to 6.0 µm, −7.9 to 10.2 µm, and −11.2 to 6.0 µm. At 3-mm measuring points, the corresponding values were −2.8 to 9.3 µm, −2.0 to 13.0 µm, −4.6 to 9.6 µm, and −6.3 to 9.7 µm, indicating that the 2 instruments were not interchangeable without adjustment. Despite that the repeatability of RTVue measurements in KC patients were acceptable, repeatability decreased gradually with the peripheralization of the measurement points. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 OCT-based devices, RTVue and MS-39, do not provide interchangeable measurements of epithelium thickness in KC patients. Repeatability decreases in cases of more severe KC, emphasizing the importance of grading before clinical examination to avoid diagnostic errors.
AB - PURPOSE: To compare agreement of corneal epithelium thickness (ET) between AS-OCT system (RTVue, Optovue) and AS-OCT/Placido topographer (MS-39, CSO) in eyes with different stages of keratoconus (KC), and to assess the repeatability of RTVue AS-OCT. DESIGN: Prospective reliability analysis. METHODS: KC eyes were classified into forme fruste KC (FFKC), mild, moderate, and severe KC. Agreement was evaluated with Bland–Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). The repeatability of RTVue was assessed via within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test–retest variability (TRT), coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: A total of 119 KC eyes were enrolled, with 21 being FFKC, 26 mild, 39 moderate, and 34 severe. The 95% LoA ranged between −5.9 and 4.8 µm for center epithelium thickness (CET), between −5.7 and 8.2 µm for thinnest epithelium thickness (TET). At 1-mm measuring points, the 95% LoA of superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal were −4.2 to 4.7 µm, −5.2 to 6.0 µm, −7.9 to 10.2 µm, and −11.2 to 6.0 µm. At 3-mm measuring points, the corresponding values were −2.8 to 9.3 µm, −2.0 to 13.0 µm, −4.6 to 9.6 µm, and −6.3 to 9.7 µm, indicating that the 2 instruments were not interchangeable without adjustment. Despite that the repeatability of RTVue measurements in KC patients were acceptable, repeatability decreased gradually with the peripheralization of the measurement points. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 OCT-based devices, RTVue and MS-39, do not provide interchangeable measurements of epithelium thickness in KC patients. Repeatability decreases in cases of more severe KC, emphasizing the importance of grading before clinical examination to avoid diagnostic errors.
KW - Corneal epithelium thickness
KW - keratoconus
KW - Optical biometry
KW - optical coherence tomography
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 38621521
AN - SCOPUS:85195044854
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 265
SP - 213
EP - 223
JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology
ER -