Review of Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge (Hetherington, Oxford UP)

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragRecension av bok/film/utställning etc.


In this book, Stephen Hetherington attacks what he thinks are two "dogmas" of epistemology. One he calls "epistemic absolutism" which amounts to the claim that knowledge is absolute: you can be with or without it, but once you have it, it is not possible to have more or less. The other is "justificationalism" which is the view that some sort of (internalist of externalist) justification is necessary for knowledge.
Sidor (från-till)106-111
TidskriftTheoria: a Swedish Journal of Philosophy
StatusPublished - 2004

Bibliografisk information

Reviewed Work(s):
Good knowledge, bad knowledge : on two dogmas of epistemology, Oxford UP (by Hetherington, Stephen Cade)

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

  • Filosofi


Utforska forskningsämnen för ”Review of Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge (Hetherington, Oxford UP)”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här