TY - JOUR
T1 - The ability of the electrocardiogram in left bundle branch block to detect myocardial scar determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
AU - Wieslander, Björn
AU - Xia, Xiaojuan
AU - Jablonowski, Robert
AU - Axelsson, Jimmy
AU - Klem, Igor
AU - Nijveldt, Robin
AU - Maynard, Charles
AU - Schelbert, Erik B.
AU - Sörensson, Peder
AU - Sigfridsson, Andreas
AU - Chaudhry, Uzma
AU - Platonov, Pyotr G.
AU - Borgquist, Rasmus
AU - Engblom, Henrik
AU - Couderc, Jean Philippe
AU - Strauss, David G.
AU - Atwater, Brett D.
AU - Ugander, Martin
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Aims: We aimed to improve the electrocardiographic 2009 left bundle branch block (LBBB) Selvester QRS score (2009 LBSS) for scar assessment. Methods: We retrospectively identified 325 LBBB patients with available ECG and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement from four centers (142 [44%] with CMR scar). Forty-four semi-automatically measured ECG variables pre-selected based on the 2009 LBSS yielded one multivariable model for scar detection and another for scar quantification. Results: The 2009 LBSS achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.54–0.66) for scar detection, and R2 = 0.04, p < 0.001, for scar quantification. Multivariable modeling improved scar detection to AUC 0.72 (0.66–0.77) and scar quantification to R2 = 0.21, p < 0.001. Conclusions: The 2009 LBSS detects and quantifies myocardial scar with poor accuracy. Improved models with extensive comparison of ECG and CMR had modest performance, indicating limited room for improvement of the 2009 LBSS.
AB - Aims: We aimed to improve the electrocardiographic 2009 left bundle branch block (LBBB) Selvester QRS score (2009 LBSS) for scar assessment. Methods: We retrospectively identified 325 LBBB patients with available ECG and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement from four centers (142 [44%] with CMR scar). Forty-four semi-automatically measured ECG variables pre-selected based on the 2009 LBSS yielded one multivariable model for scar detection and another for scar quantification. Results: The 2009 LBSS achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.54–0.66) for scar detection, and R2 = 0.04, p < 0.001, for scar quantification. Multivariable modeling improved scar detection to AUC 0.72 (0.66–0.77) and scar quantification to R2 = 0.21, p < 0.001. Conclusions: The 2009 LBSS detects and quantifies myocardial scar with poor accuracy. Improved models with extensive comparison of ECG and CMR had modest performance, indicating limited room for improvement of the 2009 LBSS.
KW - Cardiovascular magnetic resonance
KW - Electrocardiography
KW - Left bundle branch block
KW - Myocardial scar
KW - Selvester QRS score
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049538651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.05.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.05.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 30177312
AN - SCOPUS:85049538651
SN - 0022-0736
VL - 51
SP - 779
EP - 786
JO - Journal of Electrocardiology
JF - Journal of Electrocardiology
IS - 5
ER -