The case of PRO

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskriftPeer review

55 Citeringar (SciVal)
259 Nedladdningar (Pure)

Sammanfattning

Icelandic case agreement suggests that nominative case is active in PRO infinitives in much the same way as in finite clauses, thus posing a difficult and a long-standing problem for generative (GB and minimalist) case theory and the PRO Theorem. In this article, I examine the Icelandic facts in detail, illustrating that the unmarked and common nominative morphology in Icelandic PRO infinitives is regular structural nominative morphology, suggesting that PRO cannot be reduced to a copy. What went wrong in the GB approach to PRO was not PRO itself but the binding theoretic and ‘Case’ theoretic conception of it. PRO is an empty category that is simultaneously a reference variable (like overt pronouns and anaphors) and a phi-feature variable (unlike overt expressions). Due to this unique combination of variable properties, PRO cannot be deduced from other traits of grammar, such as movement, nor can it possibly be lexicalized. Importantly, also, the facts studied here suggest that case is a post-syntactic category, assigned in morphology. In contrast, Person is evidently a syntactically active category, having some of the properties and effects that have commonly been attributed to ‘Case’.
Originalspråkengelska
Sidor (från-till)403-450
TidskriftNatural Language & Linguistic Theory
Volym26
Nummer2
DOI
StatusPublished - 2008

Bibliografisk information

The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015.
The record was previously connected to the following departments: Swedish (015011001)

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

  • Språk och litteratur

Fingeravtryck

Utforska forskningsämnen för ”The case of PRO”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här