The Nominative Puzzle and the Low Nominative Hypothesis

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskriftPeer review

273 Nedladdningar (Pure)


Under the view of nominative Case taken by Chomsky (2000, 2001), one would expect nominative to be the marked or complex Case, being merged after accusative. In fact, however, it is the other way around, nominative preconditioning accusative and also being the Case of simple
structures (unaccusative, etc.). The article argues that this Nominative Puzzle is not real, the nominative argument in fact being the first argument merged, raised across the accusative later in the derivation for independent reasons. This approach not only accounts for the dependency
correlation between accusative and nominative (Burzio’s
Generalization), but also offers a derivational account of Condition A correlations (anaphors being merged higher than their ‘‘antecedents’’). Importantly, it also makes it possible to explain Icelandic quirky constructions
in terms of a general matching theory. In addition, the article develops a novel approach to Move as applying for the purpose of successful feature matching.
Sidor (från-till)289-308
TidskriftLinguistic Inquiry
StatusPublished - 2006

Bibliografisk information

The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015.
The record was previously connected to the following departments: Swedish (015011001)

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

  • Språk och litteratur


Utforska forskningsämnen för ”The Nominative Puzzle and the Low Nominative Hypothesis”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här