The ontological parsimony of mereology

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskriftPeer review

3 Citeringar (SciVal)
399 Nedladdningar (Pure)

Sammanfattning

David Lewis (Parts of classes, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 1991, 84) famously argued that mereology is ontologically innocent. Many who have considered this claim believe he was mistaken. Mereology is not innocent, because its acceptance entails the acceptance of sums, new objects that were not previously part of one’s ontology. This argument, the argument from ontological parsimony, has two versions: a qualitative and a quantitative one. I argue that the defender of mereology can neutralize both arguments by holding that, given mereology, a commitment to the parts of an object is not an extra ontological commitment, made in addition to the commitment to the object; and that if the parts of an object are ‘ontologically innocent’, then sums cannot fail to be innocent either.
Originalspråkengelska
Sidor (från-till)3253-3271
TidskriftPhilosophical Studies
Volym172
Utgåva12
DOI
StatusPublished - 2015

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

  • Filosofi

Fingeravtryck

Utforska forskningsämnen för ”The ontological parsimony of mereology”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här