Sammanfattning
Two recurrent arguments levelled against the view that enduring objects survive change are examined within the framework of the B-theory of time: the argument from Leibniz's Law and the argument from Instantiation of Incompatible Properties. Both arguments are shown to be question-begging and hence unsuccessful.
Originalspråk | engelska |
---|---|
Sidor (från-till) | 265-274 |
Tidskrift | Dialectica |
Volym | 61 |
Utgåva | 2 |
DOI | |
Status | Published - 2007 |
Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)
- Filosofi