TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a Socio-Legal Robotics: A Theoretical Framework on Norms and Adaptive Technologies
AU - Larsson, Stefan
AU - Liinason, Mia
AU - Tanqueray, Laetitia
AU - Castellano, Ginevra
N1 - Authors’ contributions: All authors contributed to the study conception
and design. This is a highly conceptual and argumentative paper, based on three research disciplines, of which the four authors relate to differently. The socio-legal foundation is primarily performed by Stefan Larsson and Laetitia Tanqueray, the Gender Studies foundation primarily by Mia Liinason and the social robotics foundation is primarily performed by Ginevra Castellano. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Stefan Larsson and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
PY - 2023/10/20
Y1 - 2023/10/20
N2 - While recent progress has been made in several fields of data-intense AI-research, many applications have been shown to be prone to unintendedly reproduce social biases, sexism and stereotyping, including but not exclusive to gender. As more of these design-based, algorithmic or machine learning methodologies, here called adaptive technologies, become embedded in robotics, we see a need for a developed understanding of what role social norms play in social robotics, particularly with regards to fairness. To this end, we i) we propose a framework for a socio-legal robotics, primarily drawn from Sociology of Law and Gender Studies. This is then ii) related to already established notions of acceptability and personalisation in social robotics, here with a particular focus on iii) the interplay between adaptive technologies and social norms. In theorising this interplay for social robotics, we look not only to current statuses of social robots, but draw from identified AI-methods that can be seen to influence robotics in the near future. This theoretical framework, we argue, can help us point to concerns of relevance for questions of fairness in human-robot interaction.
AB - While recent progress has been made in several fields of data-intense AI-research, many applications have been shown to be prone to unintendedly reproduce social biases, sexism and stereotyping, including but not exclusive to gender. As more of these design-based, algorithmic or machine learning methodologies, here called adaptive technologies, become embedded in robotics, we see a need for a developed understanding of what role social norms play in social robotics, particularly with regards to fairness. To this end, we i) we propose a framework for a socio-legal robotics, primarily drawn from Sociology of Law and Gender Studies. This is then ii) related to already established notions of acceptability and personalisation in social robotics, here with a particular focus on iii) the interplay between adaptive technologies and social norms. In theorising this interplay for social robotics, we look not only to current statuses of social robots, but draw from identified AI-methods that can be seen to influence robotics in the near future. This theoretical framework, we argue, can help us point to concerns of relevance for questions of fairness in human-robot interaction.
KW - socio-legal robotics
KW - social norms
KW - gender studies
KW - mirroring of norms
KW - adaptive technologies
KW - social robotics
KW - AI and ethics
KW - AI and norms
KW - AI governance
KW - AI transparency
KW - sociology of law
UR - https://link.springer.com/collections/biibiicddd
U2 - 10.1007/s12369-023-01042-9
DO - 10.1007/s12369-023-01042-9
M3 - Article
SN - 1875-4805
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - International Journal of Social Robotics
JF - International Journal of Social Robotics
ER -