Sammanfattning
Bertrand Russell’s speech “Why I Am Not a Christian” (1927) triggered many theologians to defend Christian beliefs. Aside from his rational criticism of the so-called “proofs” of God’s existence, it is his humorous irony as a rhetorical weapon that made many abandon their faith in Christianity and become atheists or at least agnostics. In this article I examine two British theologians’ unsuccessful attempts to counterattack Russell’s devastating analysis of some central Christian dogmas.
Originalspråk | engelska |
---|---|
Sidor (från-till) | 32-44 |
Antal sidor | 13 |
Tidskrift | Russell - Journal of the Bertrand Russell Studies |
Volym | 41 |
Nummer | 1 |
DOI | |
Status | Published - 2021 |
Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)
- Filosofi, etik och religion