Sammanfattning
Purpose: This study addresses the implications of smart city development paths (techno-centric and human-centric) by investigating the evolution of a city strategy, focusing on how different actors in a dialogue centred on strategic planning documents for Saint Petersburg, Russia, visualised the smart city and then made it calculable. Design/methodology/approach: The authors conducted a case study based on a documentary analysis supported by ethnographic elements relying on the smart city conceptual proposals, the approved city strategy and the artifacts of expert discussions leading to the strategy implementation plan. Findings: Through the lens of dialogue theory, the authors show how government and non-government actors in different organisational settings devised techno-centric smart city calculations, which arose despite an initial human-centric vision. Research limitations/implications: While the case study allowed the study to illustrate the depth and richness of the context of the authoritarian Russian state where the role of citizens in public decision-making is rather limited, different and even contrasting results could be produced in other contexts. Practical implications: There is a gap between a smart city vision and its grounding in calculations. Thus, the human-centric elements require special attention, and the organisation of the dialogue on smart city strategy must enable plurality of voices besides those of government actors. Originality/value: The case suggests viewing the human-centric and techno-centric perspectives not as dichotomous, but rather emerging consecutively throughout the journey from an initial strategic vision to its implementation in the city's calculations.
Originalspråk | engelska |
---|---|
Sidor (från-till) | 644-664 |
Antal sidor | 21 |
Tidskrift | Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management |
Volym | 34 |
Nummer | 5 |
DOI | |
Status | Published - 2022 nov. 1 |
Externt publicerad | Ja |
Bibliografisk information
Publisher Copyright:© 2022, Olga Trunova, Igor Khodachek and Aleksandr Khodachek.
Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)
- Företagsekonomi